This response is inspired by Virginia Woolf and the eavesdropping we did in Trafalgar Square. It's sort of told in an epistolary form (sort of...) and I'm not sure I knew what I was doing with it. Plot-wise it might kind of suck, so just let me know how that is, where it should go, if it should have more at the beginning, etc. I tried to link up the speaker's observations to his situation with the woman he will be writing letters to, but if that does not work, i.e. if you guys don't see that happening and have no clue what I'm talking about in those particular places and even start wondering how it connects to small bit of "actual plot" at the end, just let me know because I'm interested in seeing which direction I can take this if I can take it at all.
I'm not super proud of this piece, but I'm sure there's something in there that works, maybe certain descriptions, thoughts, something...just let me know because I'm not sure there is really even enough here character-wise to comment on/ get attached to. It isn't exactly a normal short story like we've been reading in class so I guess keep that in mind and let me know if I should abandon any weird form type things that I'm trying unsuccessfully to do or not.
Enjoy.
***
Two Letters
So in a sleep the sweat steamed plastic dis-adhered from
my face and the doors swept open and out I drifted; I was on the hunt for some
stationery, on which this letter I am now composing you shall be hand writ.
Dear Katherine, it is not often I lose myself in a city, but due to the hum of the
train, which I imagined was your voice serenading me to sleep along your side
as we squished into your aqua blue double-sized hammock hanging from that
perfect tree on that very un-London day in May back home, I managed to awake
and just get off that very stop—me, spontaneous! I jaunted up the steps and to
my astonishment met eye to eye with the Admiral on his throne above all smack
dab in the center of all London. My eyes were his eyes, my ears all the ears of
the great crowd around me. All letter writing (apologies) was forgotten. (This
place—It makes me want to affect a Victorian outlook on everything.)
The National Portrait Gallery: How I entered there, I am
not sure, but it was a sublime place (you really should go). I tell you what,
it may have been that long conversation of ours we had the night before, and
your prodding me about when exactly am I going to get around to writing you a
letter because hey you’re bored there at the lake and it would be nice—whatever
the reason, my mind was in a million and one pieces scattered throughout the
whole of London on this day. In a certain sense, it was a blessing, as I became
the sort of eavesdropper to rival you and your loose-tongued friends. The
narrow halls and winding walls of the gallery were filled over with people on
this day, all going to see this or that famous person, this or that artist,
actor, royal. And yet I alone came for them, the masses—they were my Bill
Shakespeare, my Will and Harry and Kate, my Kings and Queens.
My brain swept the gallery floor, by three friends
enthralled: “She was… She had to fight like mad.” “…She was killing people
too—” “She had to—” “Or else others would kill her, yeah…” “Right… and… our
great golden age was then, really…”
I assumed, due to the portraits around me, of kings and
queens and aristocrats through a period of 100 or so years, that they must have
been speaking about Elizabeth I. Who else? Did you know she was supposedly a
“virgin queen?” I don’t believe it. So many of the men who hung on the walls
around her were friends or confidants of hers…what woman, even one so strong,
so truly fit to rule if her portrait is true to her essence as it seems to me,
could resist the shackles of love, which bind any and all of us if we happen
upon them (and be sure that we do happen
upon them), making a slave out of knaves who in folly dare to cross a
mighty pond to escape its clutches (Love comes for us all)—who among us escapes
or suffers love unscathed? Elizabeth must have had some tender feelings
stirring in that manly stomach of hers, for what passionate lengthy rule could
be sustained by uncaring, by indifference? What drives a human to kill or have
others killed but love? Why not wed and save yourself from having to face rough
seas and rough ships if not for the love of another?
As I tread airily to another room, I see two gallery
guards in black uniform at their changing. The white one says, “…ready now?”
The black one taps his toes, chuckles without turning as the other places a
hand on his shoulder, says, “…time already?” “My turn, John.” “Time for a cup
of tea…” says John as he gets up, patting the older, fairer skinned guard on
the arm, going to what I hope for him is tea (I wonder about such a job…). What
is a friendship between two but a shared pot of tea around a corner table
during your work break?
I turn from them to another couple: two young girls of
maybe seven, with the cutest little posh accents. The one in pink (there must
be one in pink), questions: “Where are the adults?” The one in blue, hair
whipping back, head already along into the next room, reaches back a hand and
says, “Somewhere there, but let’s go here and…” Adventures and leaps of faith
make the fastest of friends; one always needs a hand to grasp so as to not fall
flat on their face in life, I find.
Though Paris gets the respect, London is certainly a city
for love! The couples are forever matching here. And they are not shy about
their displays of affection, their joy of finding themselves in the other whose
hand they tightly hold for fear it may not be there again when they look. PDA
in the tube, on the streets, in the park, in boats, in the Eye—I find it
lovely, really. You may not…I could change your mind. You only have to take a
leap across the pond to try. And it’s really the youngest ones who do it, of
course. The heat is there, the blood so close to the skin, the light in the
tunnel appearing so far off, the bells in the chapel unheard, at least distant,
ignored. What is life in London without a half of yourself? Am I truly in
London when my mind is in America?
A quick stop in the café because I require sustenance. So
much listening and admiring such interesting people one works up a mighty
hunger of another kind. I get coffee and a croissant. A girl roundabout our age
and her mother and sister are just gathering their handbags and rubbish for the
bin and moving along near me and I have no phone here to check while I munch
and sip. “How old is he? How old are you?” “Ha…skin so smooth as a baby’s
bottom…” “…why’d you even say that?” “…as a baby’s bottom…” “How old is he?”
“…That’s why I’m more mature than you…” A family’s love is something else
entirely, like a silent snowfall in deep winter: the entire world, all meaning
and significance are there in the snowflakes, individual as they fall but
amassing as they spatter the splayed old whiteness already all adrift in my
yard, such that an entire dictionary couldn’t carry the volume of speech
necessary to adequately draw back out those individuals flakes of meaning from
that vast moment. All one can do is look on in wonder, knowing not how each
snowflake, though so different from the others bonds with them all as one in
that one place and one time, forever.
The last words I remember overhearing as I left the
portrait gallery and turned toward the square were yours on the phone from the
night before: “I just feel so old…so heavy that my bones are creaking from all
the pressure. I don’t know what to do. The two of us here don’t have enough…I
mean my parents…my parents…they…this is your fault and I hate that I don’t hate
you for it.” And I hated my stupid blank stare on the other line; my hollow
voice was like a drop off the longest cliff there ever was—————in that moment,
I wanted to take the next flight to you and her, Katherine.
And yes, I did wind down the Strand to pick up some fine
flowery Bloomsbury-quality stationery on which to write my two letters of
necessity. One is for you; the other is for your parents. I am mailing both to
you. You either take the leap, mailing them theirs on your way out, or you keep
it and throw my letter to you in the fire. Because the ensnaring vines of love
have worked their way into both of your lives, my Katherine, I am afraid you
will regret both choices.
Zach,
ReplyDeleteI really like this piece! I don't know if it's quiet a short story (lack of character change and arch) but whatever, I like it! I like the lofty, aged tone to the narrator's voice - I think people really do sound like that when they write letters because it's such an old fashioned thing to do. You have a lot of great details - the PDA section was entertaining and fun.
Be careful with the lofty tone and language, just because it can turn some readers off, especially if your metaphors are too obscure to quite grasp. Also, it would be nice to see more character interaction. Maybe you could relay to Katherine a story of what happened one day - not just conversation you overheard.
Nice piece!
- Caroline
Hey Zach,
ReplyDeleteSolid work by you sir! I found it really interesting that you framed your work in this really unique letter format. I thought it was exciting how you had him transition between his growing respect and love for London, but also his distancing and falling out of love with Katherine.
In terms of making this piece even stronger, maybe make specific allusions to Wolfe's piece. Also, make distinct transitions between areas of thought and his letter writing dialogue. I was really pulled in by your story, but sometimes it's hard to see if he's thinking to himself or still in letter writing mode.
Solid work man! Thank you for sharing-
Patrick
Zach,
ReplyDeleteI adored this piece. Have some confidence in your author's note! This is a very poetic stream-of-consciousness, which is my favorite style.
This is all a letter he is writing Katherine, right? When you say "I wanted to take the next flight to you and her, Katherine", who is 'her'? Katherine's mother?
You do a great job of pausing for moments to describe a scene just enough. I like the obscure metaphors because they are phrased very eloquently. I especially liked your bit about the Queen.
The first sentence is the only part I don't understand. Otherwise, I like it just how it is!
Kate
Zach,
ReplyDeletethis was extremely creative. I loved your idea here and appreciated you taking a risk. I liked how after each scene you would ask a question or a series of questions, because they served not only as questions to Katherine, but as questions to me (the reader) too!
I agree with Kate, the first sentence threw me for a loop. Good job, though!
Scott
Zach,
ReplyDeleteNice work! I enjoyed this piece and am drawn in by your use of letter writing to create a kind of story, or even a philosophy of London life. I enjoyed your descriptions of experiences in London and felt like they made nice snapshots of the city for your reader.
I would be careful with your tone and language. The whole time I was imagining a Mr. Darcy-like character writing to his love who happened to be a girl from Alabama with an enu hammock. I like this idea, but I think you could pull it more to your advantage, maybe revealing the fact that the writer is trying to impress his reader with his language? I enjoyed it, but I'm not sure if this is what you're going for.
All in all, nice work. I think you revealed the author's train of thought well and that you've created something unique through the mind of your writer.
Thanks for sharing,
Marjorie Lupas
Zach,
ReplyDeleteThis was interesting! I liked how you were able to describe the varying scenes and how you used the dialogue you picked up to help with that. You also added humor and depth. Good job!
The letter's language itself does sound a bit lofty, as some have mentioned, and sometimes antiquated. I think you can fix that by reading it out loud to hear what doesn't sound natural.
Good start!
-Haley
Zach,
DeleteI really love yor details in this pirce. Makes it easy for the reader to be in the scenes themselves. I also love your line 'what drives a human to kill or have others killed but love' (so true).
I agree with Caroline with some of your characters. It makes ithard for the reader to know whats going on. But I think its good the story is like that. You are out walking and the city is crazy; so many things going o and I think you give the city atmosphere in this piece....crazy and hectic, but beautiful when you take the time to look around you.
Well done!
Cara Eiland
Zach,
ReplyDeleteI love the creativity or your piece and how you used the dialogue you overheard to create little scenes within the piece. I liked that it wasn't just a letter but almost a contemplation/conversation, which kept it from being cliche.
I was confused about the time period of this piece, because so of the language seemed quite formal and almost antiquated, but then you mention William and Kate so I was a bit confused. I also agree that the first sentence was a little jarring and confusing. It was a little confusing jumping from conversation to conversation so maybe just choosing a few to focus on would be better? Just a thought.
Overall I thought your piece was really unique and I was intrigued to know why the sender thought Katherine might burn his letter.
Thanks for sharing,
Carson
Zach,
ReplyDeleteYour writing style is amazing. This stream of consciousness, with the dips back and forth between "victorian" and modern english, the gliding through places, and the descriptions-- particularly the moments about PDA and love, and adventurous friendship-- it was fantastic.
The ending, as well, is this intriguing challenge to the person recieving the letter, who may regret either choice but is still called to action.
The only image that didn't work for me was in the beginning, with Nelson's eyes as the narrator's eyes. The longing for the hammock, also, seemed a little force (though I like that image more, I think it just needs to be less cluttered).
I liked this form, and look forward to seeing more of it in teh future.
-Ellen
Hey Zach,
ReplyDeleteI really like the epistolary format and the integration of the quotes, which fits the narrator's almost stream-of-consciousness letter-writing style.
However, like Carson, I found myself wondering about the time period. The subject matter is modern but his style feels more formal, like pre-1900s. I also wasn't sure about the "plot", as you put it, or the narrator's feelings towards Katherine at the end.
The style and feel of the piece is so beautiful though! Glad I got to read it.
--Angela
Zach,
ReplyDeleteI really dig the epistolary qualities of the piece. I think that it's really unique and you do a great job of that. I can definitely see where you drew inspiration from Woolf in that your stream of consciousness writing was maintained throughout the entirety of the piece.
That being said, I feel that there could be more solid details. There was a lot going on, and while I know that was supposed to be one of the concepts of the story, I really wanted to know more backstory. The history between the writer and Katherine. Her parents would recieve a letter as well? Why?
I agree with Ellen in that you have a very archaic prose style while also including modern wisps of language. I thought that was really cool. I would suggest a break of some sort before "Dear Katherine." It doesn't/shouldn't follow the letter format, but I think that a break would work somewhere. I like the internal contemplation of the character within the piece. I don't think you need characterization, I like it the way it is. Just add more solid details and make it a tad less scattered. Great job! I really enjoyed it.
Zach,
ReplyDeleteLOVE the stream of consciousness style of this, that is my favourite style and it make so much sense to me and is so relatable- I love that you put it in a setting that we have all been in, but also mention a time and a place that we have to imagine. I love the romanticism of it. I think it is a little bit scattered, but that is how these type of pieces tend to be. I didn't always understand the purpose of the parenthesis- so maybe work on that.
this is very promising
Jill
Zach,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this! As you said, it is a little bit different from the other short stories that we have read, but I found it refreshing and interesting! As Patrick said, I was also a little confused at times whether he was thinking to himself or in writing mode, so maybe try to work on making that more clear. I know that he was writing a letter, but there is a lot of "thinking to himself" and not much dialogue. I absolutely LOVED the paragraph about love. It is so on point and the line, "What is life in London without a half of yourself?" was beautiful!
Great job!
Allie
Zach,
ReplyDeleteThis piece was interesting and very enjoyable to read. I really liked how you used stream of consciousness throughout the piece. The only time I felt a confused was when the character was going from his thoughts to his writing. So maybe you could clarify?
Thanks for sharing,
Melissa